Luhrmanns Strictly Ballroom effectively undertakes the exploration of this idea through the portrayal of the young non-conformist Scott Hastings struggle to win the Pan Pacifics competition by the pursuit of his own personal dance; a rebellious action ensured to disrupt the natural order of the Australian Dance federation or ballroom dancing world, operated by the corruptive Barry Fife. As Scott throws his polka dot t-shirt in a corner of the studio revealing a simple shirt underneath, this is a simultaneous suggestion of his breaking away from his old ballroom partnership with Liz and reliance on flashy clothes to self-express himself in ballroom dance; further suggesting that his sense of belonging towards traditional ballroom dance has been shifted into feeling a sense of belonging towards his own personal dance. An agreement on a partnership ensues when both Scott and Fran, a girl with a Spanish background, share similar desires to dance non-federation steps at the Pan Pacifics. However, Barry attempts to deceive Scott into dancing the traditional federation steps at the Pan Pacifics.
He asserts: We are hoping you will win the trophy that he could not. He wouldnt want me to do this, but Im begging you, dance with Liz. The natural lighting on Scott and his long-sleeved, loose cotton white shirt effectively capturing his youth and grace and illustrating a sense of freedom contrasts to Barry, as a dim light surrounds him and he is wearing a formal black suit that hints towards self restriction. Lurhmann has intentioned this to foreshadow what style of dance will prevail in the Pan Pacifics and to demonstrate the freedom that follows with choosing not to conform, and, to highlight the imbalance of power, encouraging audience empathy for Scott. After Scott does not see through the deception and familial belonging drives him into agreeing to dance federation steps instead of pursuing his own personal style in the Pan Pacifics he is inevitably affected in a way, as his sense of personal belonging received through his personal non-federation dancing is limited.
An individual who has undertaken a physical transformation into a more appealing image by another individual can positively influence their sense of social and physical belonging. This notion is effectively explored in Lurhmanns Strictly Ballroom (1992) through the portrayal of Frans progression from a meek unattractive woman into the ideal representation of a female ballroom dancer. Luhrmanns constant use of high power shot when filming her on her parts by herself and the symbolic meaning of her glasses of meekness in comparison to the norm, reflect on her little power. Frans unattractiveness as a result of her neglected like state makes her a representation of reality in the unrealistic and fake world of traditional ballroom dancing reliant on flashy costume and heavy make-up, and is what successfully separates her from it.
Therefore, as a result of her appearance, her sense of belonging is limited. However, pressures and expectations placed on her to conform to the ideologies of ballroom dancing women instigate her transition from an unattractive woman into a more appealing woman, where she becomes no longer a representation of reality. Liz compliments Frans more appealing appearance: You look lovely Fran. You have been using that Buff puff I gave you havent you? Second person device and rhetorical question is used to reveal to the responder that her physical transformation was a result of living up to the ballroom dancing pressures and expectations of conformity, and not an act from personal decision.
Within this scene, medium shot is simultaneously used to emphasise Frans now surpassing beauty than her elders and the shot positioning Fran of equal height to Liz, Les and Doug suggests that since now she is at a higher attractive level the balance of power is equal despite age, rank and gender. As they converse, the positive expressions on Frans, Les, Liz and Dougs face and Frans open and confident stance illustrates that this physical transformation into a more appealing image has enriched Frans social and physical belonging. (These two paragraphs and conclusion done all in Biology)
The restrictions placed on an individual due to the unavoidable interactions with others and parts of the world limits their sense of personal belonging and can be dealt with escape and interaction with the wider world. The nonfiction extract from Sisters, an Anthology, undergoes the exploration of this idea through the reflection of a narrators relationship with her two sisters, Mary and Phoebe and her best friend, Beth. The narrator articulates that the inevitable differing perspectives of her blood-related sisters lead to an incomprehension which further leads to a state in their relationship where too much cannot be spoken as too much hangs on whose version prevails. Hence, this imperfect relationship is contrasted with her relationship with Beth where there is not a sliver of difference between us and where I cannot imagine the life I lived before, a world without the most perfect of sisters to draw out the imperfection and forced nature in terms of the bonds of sisterhood.
She has an exile to enrich her sense of personal belonging that is limited at home and finds it with interaction with the landscape and experiences with the world. I had a life brimming over with sparkling stories which I sent to them on the back of postcards of shinny harbours and bright reefs. They had drizzle and guinea pigs to bury, and dogs to drag out of the river. The positive connotation of shinny, sparkling and bright highlights a key and unforgettable moment of the narrators life to the responder whilst these words contrary to death, indicate her feelings of youth and vitality, and hence belonging, which is further contrary to the negative connotation of drag; that relates to a restriction of choice and images of death.
Also, the great vastness, lighter colour and greater height of water of the reefs and harbours juxtaposed with the restrictive nature, dullness of the river highlights her feelings of freedom and reiterates her vitality and hence again, greater sense of belonging. Overall, this reflects the narrators greater sense of belonging in interaction with the wider world, allowed from her exile, rather than the restricted space of sisterhood or unavoidable interactions with others. The conception of family, appearance and expectations of conformity by the authorities and the world around them negatively and positively affects an individuals sense of personal belonging.