Does Nationalism Inevitably Breed Rivalry and Conflict? Essay

Published: 2020-01-31 07:12:27
628 words
3 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Nation

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Nationalism is based upon the idea that each individual will be loyal to their nation in which they construct. Nationalists support organic communities, whereby society is naturally divided, therefore each nation holds their own national identity. Inevitably suggests that rivalry and conflict is certain. However, looking at the different branches of Nationalism, the inevitability of conflict varies. The Liberal Nationalists would not consider conflict as inevitable, which shows their naivety to the xenophobic ideas of Nationalism, as it promote a distinct Them and Us attitude, which Liberal Nationalists ignore. Their idea is to promote a Liberal Nation-State, whereby the State rules on behalf of the nation, and to promote individual freedom and protection of rights. They agree with self-determination first introduced by Woodrow Wilson, post WW1 giving a nation the right to become a State. Each independent Liberal Nation-State, will have the equal right to self-determination, therefore promoting an ordered peaceful world, suggesting conflict, with regards to Liberal Nationalist branch, is no inevitable, but unthinkable, as no nation would attempt to surpass others, leading to international peacefulness between each Liberal Nation-State.

However, arguably, their naivety towards human nature within the Liberal Nation-States makes Liberal Nationalists unable to see potential conflict. The individual nations, albeit of the same branch of Nationalism, as Nationalism suggests, would have divided opinions with regard to various punishments, jurisdiction, rights and so on, therefore, leading to conflict, even though the Liberal Nationalists do not consider this inevitable. Conservative Nationalists believe nations emerge naturally. Their Nation-State objective is to promote order, stability and cohesion, not a social contract of Liberal Nationalists promoting peace and tolerance. They defend traditional institutions (i.e. the Monarchy and Parliament), thus promoting Patriotism, whereby loyalty to ones country will inevitably encourage loyalty to ones nation. They take action when our political institutions are under threat from change.

National identity and maintaining order and stability is of key interest, therefore, justifying their hatred towards Immigration, as it encourages the disruption of social order and blurs national identity; and Supranationalism (EU), as it undermines the authoritative position of our political institutions. This therefore could lead to inevitable conflict, as Conservative Nationalism fears foreigners, linking it to racism and inevitable cultural and moral rivalry. They are intolerant, in comparison to Liberal Nationalists, and focus, not on peace, but the promotion of social order within the nation. Similarly, Expansionist Nationalists inevitably breed rivalry and conflict, purely because they are extremely militaristic and aggressive; rejecting the idea of self-determination or all states having equal rights to self-determination, which is what the Liberal Nationalists support. Their idea is based upon inequality between nations, that some are automatically superior in comparison to others.

They can be described as Chauvinistic due to their belief of dominance of certain nations over others, examples being in Russia, with the superiority of the slavs. They enjoy conflict and War as they thrive off their military achievements, which by extension to them, demonstrates a nations achievements. Expansionist Nationalists are viewed as militaristic, as they strongly follow the for or against attitude; you either support or reject their ideas, therefore, inevitably breeding conflict between opposing beliefs. Inevitable is an awkward word to describe conflict, simply because, it suggests that conflict is expected, however, looking further into the different branches of an ideologies beliefs it is clear that they have varied opinions about the on set of conflict.

Liberal Nationalists would not predict conflict, yet alone it being considered inevitable, as they support peace and international cooperation between nations. However, Conservative and Expansionist Nationalists would argue otherwise. They enjoy conflict and basking in their previous military successes. They support order amongst society and see inequality between nations as normal, therefore inevitably breeding rivalry between the opposing and weaker nations, trying to prove themselves otherwise.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read