The author states that a party is guilty of copyright infringement if they violate one of the five exclusive rights given to copyright owners under the Copyright Act. (Tysver 2005) Thus the aim of copyright is to prevent reproducing or copying of materials without special permission. The author thinks that Internet providers should be liable for infringement of copyright. It is necessary to agree with Tysver, because Internet providers provide chargeable access to world web and thus should protect customers from copyright violations.
(Tysver 2005) Furthermore, ISP should be responsible for computer operating as a server, because it is one more way to make copies without permission. The author notes that ISP is aware of Copyright Act and thus they are liable for infringements even if they do not directly take part in the copying or distribution of a work. (Tysver 2005) Actually, the author introduces the term contributory infringement meaning that a party is considered guilty of rights violations if they cause infringing conduct or contribute to infringing activities.
Additionally, the author speaks about vicariously liability stating that person may be liable for the infringing actions of another if the person has the right and ability to control the infringers acts and receives a direct financial benefit from the infringement. (Tysver 2005)It is apparent that copyrights have to be protected and it is necessary to provide liabilities to ISP, because they are the only source of materials protection in the web.
References Tysver, D. (2005). ISP Liabilities. Retrieved November 17, 2006, from http://www. bitlaw. com/internet/isp. html.