Handguns have protected numerous individuals for more than 1. 9 million times annually (GOF, 2001). Another reason for opposing gun control is the fact that crime is reduced when concealed carry laws are implemented (GOF, 2001). It has been found that 77% of all violent crime occurs in public places (Smith, 2007, p. 4). This statistics alone shows how necessary it is for concealed carry laws to be implemented. There are those who argue that concealed carry laws will result in higher crime rates, but that argument is false (Smith, 2007). In fact, the opposite is true. In the United States, forty states have the right-to-carry laws.
In these states, there was no increase in the crime rates after the right-to-carry law was implemented (Smith, 2007, p. 1). In fact, the crime rates decreased. When citizens are permitted to bring concealed weapons, there is a significant drop in the rates of violent crimes such as murder (8%), rape (5%) and aggravated assault (7%) (Smith, 2007). Ironically, there are higher crime rates in states which have no right-to-carry laws. For instance, the rate of serious crimes in Texas experienced a 50% decrease from the national average since the concealed carry law was passed in 1995 (Smith, 2007).
Consequently, as the above statistics show, gun ownership and possession are actually effective in avoiding crime. This is primarily because criminals avoid attacking armed individuals (GOF, 2001). A study on American prisoners conducted by James Wright and Kathleen Daly from the University of Massachusetts proves this fact (Kopel, 1988). Among the felons who were involved in the study, three-fifths have responded that a criminal would indeed refrain from attacking a possible victim if the said victim is recognized as armed.
Two-fifths of the studied prisoners stated that they did not push through with the crime because they were uncertain if their victim was armed (Kopel, 1988). Moreover, in a poll conducted by the Justice Department, 74% of the participating prisoners all said that one of the reasons why burglars do not enter houses when there are people at home is because they are scared to be shot (GOF, 2001). The poll also revealed that 57% of prisoners are far distressed by the possibility of encountering a victim with a gun than an encounter with the police. The outcome of the studies is no surprise.
It was found that the majority of those who use firearms for self-defense would simply wave their guns or fire a warning shot to drive away their attacker (GOF, 2001). About 8% of the warning shot incidents result in the wounding or killing of the attacker (GOF, 2001). Gun control would also work against the empowerment of women, as gun ownership actually allows women to protect and defend themselves from any form of attack (GOF, 2001). It was said that around 200,000 women utilize guns for self-defense in cases of sexual abuse. Way back in 1966, cases of rape increased in Orlando, Florida.
The police force reacted to this situation by creating a program that will train women in the use of firearms (Kopel, 1988). In 1967, there was an 88% crime rate decrease in Orlando; even the burglary rate decreased by 25%. In the end, the publicity of the training effectively deterred crime. The 2,500 women who participated in the training did not need to use their weapon. The effect also had a rather long duration. After five years, the low rate of rape cases was still maintained. Meanwhile, the rest of Florida experienced a significant increase (Kopel, 1988).