Hussein continued his dominion over Iraq, further supporting terrorist organizations, and bringing more harm for his inhabitants of the nation (Nye, 2003). In 2003, the administration of U. S. President Bush wanted change for Husseins regime. Thus, the war started between Iraq and U. S. The war lasted for a time but on March 19, 2003, U. S. coalition forces triumphed towards Iraqs liberation to Hussein, thus came the vision of establishing a new Iraqi government (Nye, 2003). ADVANTAGES
President Bush (2003) stated that The United States has no intention of determining the precise form of Iraqs new government. That choice belongs to the Iraqi people. Yet, we will ensure that one brutal dictator is not replaced by another. All Iraqis must have a voice in the new government, and all citizens must have their rights protected. Rebuilding Iraq will require a sustained commitment from many nations, including our own: we will remain in Iraq as long as necessary, and not a day more (Program on International Policy Attitudes, 2006).
Iraq success showed victory against the ideology of international terrorism. The victory obtained from the war that had been spearheaded by the U. S. coalition troops, strengthened the capability of the country in fighting terrorists. Moreover, it signals the key formation of economics of the country that had been stationary. It serves as an inspiring example for other countries facing similar conditions (Nye, 2003). The freedom obtained by Iraqis is rightfully theirs and has been effectual at giving them what is morally theirs an apt and proper act that the United States has done.
With the help of the U. S. , Iraq has been made a safer place to live in as their ruthless dictator has been overthrown from power. It also revealed the reliability of U. S. power and its commitment to friends, as it remained a constant partner of the Iraqis in its battle of rights and freedom. Aside from serving the interests of both Iraq and the U. S. , the overthrowing of Hussein from power mainly ensured a better future for Iraq as it establishes a peaceful and democratic government (Kupchan, 2003).
Hanlon and Campbell (2006) stated that establishing a peaceful and democratic government would not be an easy process particularly for those individuals who have been curtailed of their rights for quite a while; thus, supervision is needed from U. S. eventually leaving the Iraqi independent in due time to govern their own country. In addition, the idea of building a safer, better world cannot be accomplished independently; thus help is rendered where it is needed. Through alliances and coalitions, the country gains support from other countries, opening not only communication channels but as economic opportunities for the country as well.
Moreover, the partnership of Iraq with the U. S. opens memberships for international organizations which will be of further use for the country as it seeks its way to good governance. Also at this time, the US military has withdrawn from Iraq because the oil bonanza must be protected as soon as the Washington oil law is approved by the Iraqi parliament. Iraqis themselves are fighting, thus peace must be restored first or at least be maintained before the U. S. troops can completely withdraw its power and control over Iraq (Nye, 2003). DISADVANTAGES
Quinlivian (2003) reported that Iraqis have triumphed over the power of Hussein. Iraqis have been freed from the power of Hussein, who had curtailed their rights and privileges as Iraqi citizens; however the perceived take over of the United States is evaluated as a similar scenario. Four years have passed, more than a billion dollars have been spent and many U. S. soldiers have been killed and yet the political settlement among Iraqis and the U. S. is still far at hand. The U. S. administration must start withdrawing from Iraq. As the U. S.
delays withdrawal strategies, the outcome is likely to be worse. Americans supported the decision of Bush in helping Iraq but later on almost 62 percent of the American population believed that Bushs action is not proper. The believed that rather than stopping terrorism, it inflamed terrorism and set back reconciliation among the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds all the more (Kupchan, 2003). In addition, the money given by the U. S government to alleviate Iraqs status had been adequate and to further support the country would be too much to take for the Americans.
Thus, the stand of President Bush regarding this issue is unacceptable; he is protecting his image as a tough leader who will not lose war. Friendship and help is not the issue but the image of the U. S. as having strong and reliable military forces (Quinlivian, 2003). Nye (2003) reported that Iraqis are controlled by the U. S. , and the help rendered to overthrow Hussein has been highly appreciated by its citizens, but the stay and controlling powers usurped by the U. S. cannot be allowed for long. The war among the Iraqis and the U. S troops will not be put into end, and it will cause numerous deaths more for the U. S . troops if they insist on staying at Iraq .
The insufficient knowledge of Iraqis concerning bureaucracy is not the source of difficulty but what the Bush administration has conditioned them to believe in. The aims of establishing a good government is the topmost priority for the country along with, openness to American influence, dependence on American power, and to be of support to U. S. at all times. The strategy being imposed is based on two fundamental errors, naive optimism concerning the military forces and the underestimation of power and politics among themselves.
Hence, Iraqis would believe that the country would not be able to stand on its own without U. S. support (O Hanlon and Campbell, 2006). Americans often misunderstand the extent of their power, stretching these up to the future or as far as it can take them. As in this case, their victory was to overthrow the ruthless dictator of Iraq and at the same, win back the rights and privileges of Iraqi. Also, the war against the dictator proved that the Iraq is not a breeding ground of terrorists. U. S. after winning the battle can have withdrawn help from Iraq, because giving back their rights and privileges as Iraqi citizens is already enough.
Financial support can also be given because it underwent tragic destructions because of the war that occurred (Program on International Policy Attitudes, 2006). Iraq is still in a state of devastation, even worse that they themselves are fighting. Bush and the administration are unable to realize that devastation occurring in Iraq is brought about by the too much help rendered, instead of withdrawing powers from Iraq, US troops opted to stay and supervise. The people are terrified not only the Iraqi but also the Americans for what the president and his administration is doing.
As a result, Iraqis have no place to go even in their own country, no money and food. Despite of the uncontrollable situation, Bush stands firm about his decision, defying what the majority had conformed and instead having his own flight as the president, continuously devastating Iraqis (Kupchan, 2003). MY OPINION All the facts have been laid down, supporting the assertion that U. S. troops must be removed from Iraq. This is not only for the safety of U. S. soldiers, but as well as to give what is proper for the Iraqis.
The military support given by the U. S. troops during the battle has been much appreciated, and thus it is the time to give up the power as the Iraqi parliament exercises its power. The dictatorship of Hussein is happening again but in a subtle way, with the U. S. building the nation and somehow taking hold of the country. Almost four years of supervision would be enough to make them capable of full control of their country. No one has the right to take over ones country as agreed upon in the United Nations and there seems to be a thin boundary between helping and dictatorship.
This may not be apparently observed, as it is evident that U. S. had planned far better than liberating Iraq from Hussein. When will be the right time to withdraw powers from Iraq? If Iraq had become a colony of U. S. or country ruled over by U. S. for their own self purpose. Strengthening Iraqs governance would entail some time but along the process, the lessons learned will make them a better country and nation. They should be allowed to learn by themselves, and only if help is sought must it be given. The more that the U. S.
desires to alleviate the status of Iraq, the stronger the doubts that people have of their real intentions. It may be timely and apt to choose the pull-out of U. S. troops to veer away from this controversy and give back to Iraqis what is rightfully theirs.
References Nye, J. Jr. (2003) The Paradox of American Power: Why the Worlds Only Superpower Cant Go It Alone. Oxford University Press, USA Kupchan, C. (2003). The End of the American Era: U. S. Foreign Policy and the Geopolitics of the Twenty-first Century. Vintage, USA. OHanlon,M. and Campbell,J. (2006) Iraq Index: Tracking Variables of Reconstruction & Security in Post-Saddam Iraq Number of Daily Attacks by Insurgents and Militias. Retrieved last May 7, 2007, from http://www. brookings. edu/iraqindex Quinlivan,J. (2003).
Burden of Victory: The Painful Arithmetic of Stability Operations, RAND Review. Retrieved last May 7, 2007 , from http://www. rand. org/publications/randreview/issues/summer2003/burden. html Program on International Policy Attitudes, The Iraqi Public on the US Presence and the Future of Iraq (2006). Retrieved last May 7, 2007 from http://www. worldpublicopinion. org/pipa/pdf/sep06/Iraq_Sep06_quaire. pdf